FROZEN EMBRYOS IN TEXAS DIVORCES

When couples go through a divorce in Texas, one of the complex issues that can arise involves the disposition of frozen embryos created through In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). This topic has become increasingly relevant with the advancements in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), where IVF is the most common method used.

IVF involves combining eggs and sperm outside the body in a lab setting. If more embryos are created than are used in pregnancy attempts, these embryos are often frozen for future use. When couples who have stored embryos decide to divorce, deciding what happens to these embryos can be emotionally charged and legally complex.

Texas courts, like those in many states, face challenging decisions because there is no uniform law that dictates how to handle these embryos. Therefore, courts have to consider the agreements couples may have made before their embryos were frozen, alongside current laws and ethical considerations about the potential for life those embryos represent.

Approaches to Embryo Disposition
There are three primary approaches courts may use when deciding the fate of frozen embryos:

Contractual Approach: This is the most common initial method where courts look at any agreements the couple made about their embryos before they were frozen. These agreements can be part of consent forms signed at the IVF clinic which detail what should happen in the event of death, divorce, or other circumstances. If such an agreement exists and is clear, courts typically uphold these agreements unless they violate public policy.

Balancing Approach: If no prior agreement exists, or if the existing agreement is unclear or unenforceable, courts may use a balancing approach. Here, they weigh each person's reasons for wanting to use or not use the embryos. Factors considered might include the possibility of each person to have children biologically or through other means, the intentions behind undergoing IVF, and any potential emotional or logistical impacts.

Contemporaneous Mutual Consent: Under this less common approach, both parties must agree to the disposition of the embryos at the time of the divorce, regardless of any previous agreement. If one party changes their mind, the embryos remain frozen until a mutual decision is made.

Texas Law and Embryo Disposition
While Texas does not have specific laws that address the disposition of frozen embryos in a divorce directly, the state does follow general principles that could apply:

• Contract Enforcement: Texas courts generally enforce contracts unless they are against public policy. This includes agreements made about the disposition of embryos.

• Respecting Intentions: Where possible, Texas courts try to respect the original intentions and agreements made by the couple at the time the embryos were created.

In Texas, the disposition of frozen embryos during a divorce has been directly addressed in the landmark case, Roman v. Roman, which illustrates the application of the contractual approach in such disputes. This case is a prime example of how Texas courts handle conflicts over frozen embryos when there is a prior agreement between the parties.

Case Background: Roman v. Roman
In Roman v. Roman, the Texas Supreme Court dealt with a dispute over frozen embryos following a divorce. The couple had undergone IVF and created several embryos, which were then frozen. Before starting the IVF treatment, the couple had signed an agreement with the fertility clinic. This agreement specified that in the event of a divorce, the embryos would be discarded.

Court's Decision and Rationale
After the couple filed for divorce, one party wanted to preserve the embryos while the other sought to enforce the agreement to discard them. The case eventually reached the Texas Supreme Court, which had to decide whether to honor the agreement made at the fertility clinic.

The Texas Supreme Court upheld the agreement, emphasizing the importance of contracts and the autonomy of individuals to make decisions regarding their reproductive cells. The court ruled that the agreement was clear and enforceable, and it required the disposition of the embryos as originally agreed upon by the couple—meaning the embryos would be discarded.

Rule of Law from Roman v. Roman
The Roman v. Roman decision established a clear precedent that in Texas, agreements regarding the disposition of frozen embryos made prior to the storage of those embryos are generally binding. The court highlighted the principle that adults have the right to enter into contracts and that these contracts should be upheld unless they violate public policy. This decision aligns with the contractual approach, where written agreements made at the time of embryo creation are considered valid and enforceable in disputes arising from a divorce.

The legal landscape surrounding the disposition of frozen embryos in Texas was further solidified by the 2023 case of Atoun v. Atoun. This case affirmed the principles set forth in the earlier Roman v. Roman decision, continuing the trend of Texas courts enforcing pre-existing agreements regarding embryos created via IVF.

Case Background: Atoun v. Atoun
In Atoun v. Atoun, the couple had entered into an agreement with their IVF clinic which stipulated that the embryos would be discarded in the event of a divorce. Despite this clear agreement, the trial court awarded the embryos to the wife. However, this decision was reversed on appeal.

Court's Decision and Rationale
The appeals court in Atoun v. Atoun cited Roman v. Roman, drawing parallels to the similar agreement in that case. The appeals court emphasized the elements of a binding contract and held that the agreement was enforceable as it was not against public policy and was clear and unambiguous regarding the parties’ intent upon divorce.

The appeals court underscored the enforceability of contracts regarding the disposition of embryos, noting that such agreements should be respected unless they contravene Texas public policy. The court also noted the legislative silence on the issue since the Roman decision as an indication of legislative acquiescence to the judiciary's stance on these matters.

Legal Implications
The ruling reinforced the contractual approach, where agreements made at the time of IVF are presumed valid and enforceable. This case highlighted that:

• Contracts regarding embryos are seen as any other legal contract that must adhere to standard legal criteria to be considered binding and enforceable.
• Legislative inaction following significant court decisions can be interpreted as an affirmation of those decisions, influencing how courts may perceive the standing of those rulings in future cases.

Ethical and Social Considerations
Atoun v. Atoun also addressed the ethical aspect of whether embryos should be considered "unborn children." The appeals court maintained that under the context of the agreements pertaining to IVF and divorce, embryos do not confer parental rights that could be terminated, as they are considered property under the agreements made.

Implications for Future Cases
The decisions in Roman v. Roman and Atoun v. Atoun highlight the importance of clear, well-documented agreements regarding the disposition of frozen embryos in Texas. These cases illustrate that such agreements will generally stand in court, reaffirming the autonomy of individuals to make legally binding decisions about their reproductive cells at the time of IVF treatment. For couples in Texas, this underlines the necessity of careful planning and legal consultation when considering IVF as a means to parenthood, ensuring that their intentions are clearly documented and legally protected.

Conclusion
As demonstrated by these cited cases, Texas courts respect and enforce agreements made regarding frozen embryos if they are clear and voluntarily entered into. Couples considering IVF are advised to carefully consider and document their decisions about the disposition of embryos. This proactive approach not only aligns with Texas law but also ensures that both parties' intentions are respected, reducing the scope for disputes in the event of a relationship breakdown.

Ethical Considerations and Future Directions
The lack of specific legislation in Texas and many other states means that these cases can result in inconsistent outcomes, which could be emotionally and financially draining for the parties involved. Ethical considerations, such as the potential for life in the embryos, add further complexity to these legal battles.

Future legislative actions could help provide clearer guidelines and reduce the variability in court decisions. This would not only make the process more predictable but also respect the deeply personal and sensitive nature of decisions about potential parenthood.

As technology and societal norms evolve, so too will the legal landscapes around issues like these. For now, couples considering IVF might consider clearly documenting their intentions regarding the embryos in legal agreements, ideally with legal counsel who understands both family and reproductive law. This proactive step can help mitigate future legal conflicts should relationships change.

---