The Palmer Law Firm
  • CALL: 832-819-3529
  • Blog
  • FREE CONSULTATIONS
  • Services
  • Bio
  • Why Choose Us?
  • Client Process
  • FAQs
  • Should My Child Return to School?

My husband claims that the house is his separate property and the court cannot award it to me in the divorce.  Is he right?

4/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture


My husband and I lived together for about a year before we got married.  We were looking for a home and decided on one just before our wedding ceremony.  To make sure the loan went through, we applied through my husband's credit (which was excellent- mine was not good due to a recent bankruptcy).  He got the loan and we financed 100% of the payments.  My husband signed an earnest money contract and we went off to our wedding.  When we got back, we closed on the house and I co-signed all the paperwork as the wife.  Thereafter, we made all the loan payments from our joint account.

Now that we are divorcing, my husband claims that the house is his separate property and the court cannot award it to me in the divorce.  Is he right?


As odd as it may sound, and as unfair as it may seem, your husband is probably right.

All property that is possessed during a marriage is presumed by the courts to be community property and subject to division by the courts.  However, this presumption can be rebutted if a party can show that the property was acquired before the marriage.

The result is what is called the "Inception of Title" rule, which basically says if you can prove the property became the legal ownership of one party before the marriage, it is considered that party's separate property and cannot be taken from him or her in the divorce.  

Normally ownership begins in the moment when you obtained legal title to the property, but oddly, not in the case of real estate.  For real estate, the court traces the characterization back to the earnest money contract.  This was the holding in Wierzchula v. Wierzchula, a 1981 case.  

However, there are several factors here which should give you some solace:

1.  It is your husband's burden to overcome the community property presumption.  For example, if he can't produce the earnest money contract in court, the judge may declare the property community anyway.

2.  Just because the property is characterized as your husband's separate property doesn't mean you loose out on all the mortgage payments that were made from your joint account.  You will still have an equitable reimbursement claim on all that money- which the court may award you.  You may not get the house itself, but you can get back a lot of the value of it.  Make sure that your pleadings ask for this.

3.  The Wierzchula case mentions the fact that the house in question was the homestead of the parties, that is, they were living in it.  If your house was not a homestead but instead was, or at some point became, a rental or other investment property, you may be entitled to the income generated from that property.  The general rule is that rents collected during a marriage, even if from one party's separate property are considered community property. (McElwee v. McElwee, 1995).

So the bottom line is that although your husband can't lose title to the house, under your circumstances, the court is free to reimburse back to the community estate the mortgage payments made on the house, and also any income generated from the house as it deems fair and right.  I would also suggest that if you can prove that the house has appreciated in value significantly over the time of the marriage, then you may also be able to convince the court that the appreciation is also community property, subject to right and proper division.  However, you would have to investigate this further because in today's depressed real estate market such appreciation is no longer an assured fact.  

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Need more information about this or any other topic involving family law in Texas?
    ​
    Click the button below to book a

    FREE ATTORNEY CONSULT
    Book Now
    832-819-3529
    Picture
    Attorney Sean Y. Palmer has over 18 years of legal experience as a Texas Attorney and over 24 years as a Qualified Mediator in civil, family and CPS cases. Palmer practices exclusively in the area Family Law and handles Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support, Adoptions, and other Family Law Litigation cases.  He represents clients throughout the greater Houston Galveston area, including: Clear Lake, NASA, Webster, Friendswood, Seabrook, League City, Galveston, Texas City, Dickinson, La Porte, La Marque, Clear Lake Shores, Bacliff, Kemah, Pasadena, Baytown, Deer Park, Harris County, and Galveston County, Texas.
    Call
    ​ 832-819-3529

    Archives

    February 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    July 2019
    June 2019
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Adoption
    Coronavirus
    Custody
    Disasters
    Divorce
    Divorce League City
    Grounds For Modification
    Harassment
    Holidays
    Litigation
    Parenting
    Property Rights
    Single Fathers
    Social Media
    Statistics
    Texas Divorce

    RSS Feed

The Palmer Law Firm

www.thepalmerlawfirm.com
www.mydivorcefirm.com


(c) 2021 Sean Y. Palmer

DISCLAIMER

​This website is for educational purposes. The information you obtain at this site is informational only and is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.  You should consult with an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.   Sean Y. Palmer is the attorney responsible for the content of this site.  


DATA NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act, and the Texas Medical Records Privacy Act of the Texas Health and Safety Code, consumers are noticed that their protected health care information may be transmitted electronically.​




​

  • CALL: 832-819-3529
  • Blog
  • FREE CONSULTATIONS
  • Services
  • Bio
  • Why Choose Us?
  • Client Process
  • FAQs
  • Should My Child Return to School?